Two options are available for the deployment of applications and services: cloud-native or on-premises hosting.

Two options are available for the deployment of applications and services: cloud-native or on-premises hosting.

Cloud-native hosting is gaining in popularity. While traditional on-premises hosting was the choice of many organizations, it has become more popular over recent years.

This article will examine the differences between on-premise and cloud-native hosting, and their respective advantages and disadvantages.

What is On-Premise Hosting?

Hosting on-premise, or in-house, is the deployment of applications and services to servers located inside an organization.

When using on-premises hosting, an organization owns and manages the hardware, software and infrastructure required to run its applications.

Hosting on-premises requires a significant investment upfront in hardware and software including servers, storage devices and networking equipment.

IT staff is also needed by organizations to maintain hardware and manage infrastructure. The organization owns and manages the hardware and software, so it has a higher level of customization and control.

Hosting on-premises allows organizations to have greater control over infrastructure and data.

As the organization owns and manages the hardware and the software, there are greater levels of compliance and security. On-premise hosting has some disadvantages.

Scalability is one of the main disadvantages of hosting on-premises.

The organization must anticipate future requirements and make investments in hardware and software to meet them. On-premise hosting is expensive and difficult to scale up and down.

On-premise hosting is also vulnerable to disasters such as power outages, fires or floods. This can cause significant downtime.

What is Cloud Native Hosting?

Cloud-native Hosting involves the deployment of applications and services in the cloud using an infrastructure provided by a cloud service provider.

Cloud-native hosting allows organizations to avoid owning or managing the hardware and software that underpins their services. They pay as they go for cloud services.

Cloud-native hosts offer greater flexibility and scalability to organizations. Cloud service providers provide a wide range of services. Organizations can select the services they require, scale them up or down, and only pay for what they use.

Cloud service providers also offer high levels of reliability, security, and availability.

Cloud-native hosting has also its disadvantages. Because organizations don’t own or manage their infrastructure, they are less able to customize and control the system.

Cloud-native hosting is also expensive for large organizations that use a lot of cloud services.

Cloud-Native vs On-Premise Hosting

Both cloud-native and on-premises hosting have advantages and disadvantages. Consider the following factors to help you choose which option is right for your business.


Cloud-native hosting is more scalable compared to on-premises hosting. Cloud service providers provide a range of services that can be scaled up and down easily as required. On-premise hosting, however, requires that organizations invest in hardware and/or software up-front, which is costly and difficult to scale.


Hosting on-premises requires a significant investment upfront in hardware and software as well as ongoing management and maintenance costs. Cloud-native hosts, on the contrary, offer a pay-as-you-go model where organizations pay only for the services that they use.

Control and Customization

Hosting on-premises offers more control and customization of the infrastructure and data. The infrastructure and data are more in control of the organization since they own and manage their hardware and software. Cloud-native web hosting offers less customization and control because the infrastructure is managed and owned by the cloud provider.

Security and Compliance

Hosting on-premises offers more security and compliance because the hardware and software are installed at your premises

IP Address Allocation

In the case of on-premises hosting IP addresses are usually assigned manually. Each device connected to the system is assigned an IP address by the network administrator. This can be a time-consuming process, especially in large networks.

Cloud-native hosting is usually automated. Cloud providers like AWS, Azure and Google Cloud assign IP addresses automatically to new instances or services. These IP addresses may be public or private.

Private IP addresses can only be accessed within the cloud service provider’s network.

Kubernetes, for example, can be used to dynamically allocate IP addresses in cloud-native hosting. Kubernetes assigns an IP address to each container as it is created. These IP addresses are usually reused after the container has been deleted.

Automation of IP address assignment can increase efficiency and reduce error compared to on-premises hosting.

It is still important to manage IP addresses properly to avoid conflicts and other problems. IP address management tools, such as DHCP(Dynamic Host Config Protocol), can be used in both cloud-native hosting and on-premises to ensure proper management and streamline IP address allocation.

The conclusion of the article is:

Cloud-native hosting is a method of developing and running applications that are optimized for cloud infrastructure.

This approach emphasizes scalability and flexibility. It also stresses resilience and automation. Cloud-native apps are typically built using microservices architecture and leverage containerization and orchestration.

Cloud-native Hosting allows organizations to benefit from the advantages of cloud computing including cost savings and speed. It also enables them to modernize and innovate their applications more quickly.